Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 8181 - 8200 of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2013, 9:17 am by Rick St. Hilaire
§ 545 (smuggling) because the archaeological material "are goods or merchandise smuggled, clandestinely introduced into the united States, imported contrary to law .... [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:53 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeNo Concerns Raised for Post-Trial Inquiry of Juror Whose Letter to Court Concerned Other, Pregnant Juror United States v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Washington (2004)), and a similar issue in the federal guidelines system (United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:44 am by Lyle Denniston
United States). ** Whether a decision by a court can constitute the unconstitutional seizure of property under the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantees of just compensation for such seizures. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:29 am by Kali Borkoski
United States, in which the petition was filed by Canadian businessman Conrad Black. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
State Univ. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (“City of Marina”) or the appellate decision in Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm by Haley Proctor
Mauskopf, the Court (Judge Walker, joined by Judge Edwards) held unconstitutional provisions of the code of conduct of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that prohibit its employees from engaging in partisan political expression outside of the office. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Because Parker has shown that the state courts unreasonably applied Jackson v. [read post]