Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 8181 - 8200 of 41,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death; and3. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
This was the question tackled by the Kluwer Patent Blog, which takes a look at emerging forensics methods in the PRC, which aim to make the process of collecting evidence in China slightly easier and more cost efficient.Right to be forgottenIPWatchdog looks at the global implications of Google v CNIL, which addressed requests for de-referencing (or 'the right to be forgotten'), with the case ultimately ruling that de-referencing only need be carried out on versions of the… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death; and3. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:51 am by Lyle Denniston
United States), and whether it is unconstitutional for a state court to exclude an accused individual and defense lawyers from a hearing to examine the legality of prosecutors’ exclusion of minority jurors from serving (Chappell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm by Sonia Katyal
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:51 pm by Edward Smith
Results can differ depending on the power source used and where the technician taps into the data. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 6:15 pm by Juan Antunez
The durable power of attorney stated: I, LILLIAN G. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by Matt Johnston
” So states an order of the Montana Supreme Court, in Office of State Public Defender on Behalf of L.K. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]