Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 8181 - 8200 of 13,583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 6:56 am
  “strength in weakness” is an overly simplistic explanation: Judith embodies (in political terms) “the people v. tyranny”, (in feminist terms) ”righteous woman vs. marauding man” and (in County Music terms) “git-er done gal v. skunk-drunk asshole. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:40 pm by Trey Childress
  That is the question that the plaintiffs in Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The Board concluded that the Association’s mandatory on-call and General Municipal Law §207-c proposals were nonarbitrable under §209.4(g) of the Act because they were unitary demands that included inseparable nonarbitrable components under §209.4(g) of the Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Having considered the Notice dated December 13, 2011 concerning amended R 71 and new R 71a (OJ EPO 2012, 52) and the draft Guidelines, C-V 4, I tend to believe that the way in which the ED acted here is blameless, even under the new regime. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Combining these two and stating that G 2/10 has added criteria to G 1/03 does not sound right to me. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:57 am by David J. DePaolo
" The case interpreting 440.20(12)(c)(2) was Lopez v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Today it is recognised across the common law world that a claim for restitution founded on unjust enrichment is founded neither on consent nor on wrongdoing (see for example Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale and Kleinwort Benson v Birmingham City Council). [read post]