Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 8181 - 8200 of 36,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2011, 10:09 am
I appeared on The Proactive Employer Podcast on Friday to discuss Thompson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:36 am by Tom Smith
Bush, 2008); struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 7:26 am by John Jascob
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has joined with four sister circuits—the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and D.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
For The Wall Street Journal, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin report that “[t]he Supreme Court on Monday upheld a Virginia law that prohibits uranium mining within the commonwealth’s borders, in a splintered ruling that affirmed the powers of the states to regulate mining on private lands within their territories,” in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
In a 7-2 decision, the Court found the state's law violated the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:13 am by Daniel Schwartz
Ball State University, a sexual harassment case that has important implications for the scope of sexual harassment cases. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 5:28 am by Unknown
(International Economic Powers Act (IEEPA); Indian Commerce Clause; Jay Treaty of 1794) Bird, et al. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 10:41 am by Kirk Jenkins
The Court pointed out that it had long ago rejected the proposition that there was an unstated police power exception to the Pension Clause in Felt v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The court stated that absent such a law, the mining of metadata is unlawful: “Our law demands clarity, especially when the claimed power is so demonstrably at odds with … privacy”. amaBhungane must now apply to the Constitutional Court to confirm the declarations of Rica’s unconstitutionality. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 11:48 am by Michael Steven Green
That means that Story thought that the federal court in Swift had its interpretive power because New York officials, by adopting a common law system for the state, gave it this power. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:01 am by Harry Styron
I’ve summarized those court opinions here, including an update on Debaliviere Place Association v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:05 am by Howard M. Wasserman
ShareContinuing an unbroken decades-long run, the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to extend the right to sue federal officers for damages under Bivens v. [read post]