Search for: "Summers v. Summers"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 9,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
Solis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm
The first judgment : A Local Authority v B, F & G [2014] EWCOP B18 (21 March 2014) HHJ Cardinal in Court of Protection. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
"); United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/5vG Cash v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Judge Jones invited final argument in the form of videotaped presentations from counsel so that the videotapes could be distributed to his technical advisors later in the summer. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
That’s a lot, but adding $100 billion to the Sarin and Summers estimate of the current tax gap ($630 billion) does not come close to $1 trillion. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
” Baxter v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
The Cassinelli Appellate Court then went on to renounce constructive /resulting trust as to other assets held by the (former) service member spouse as available remedies as well, reasoning that would violate federal law and the holding of Mansell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
” They are Rucho v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
