Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8181 - 8200 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Sharkey1625 STATE INNOVATION AND PREEMPTION: LESSONS FROM STATE CLIMATE CHANGE EFFORTSAlexandra B. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:43 pm by Richard D. Friedman
The certificate cannot be admitted consistently with the Confrontation Clause unless a witness with personal knowledge – presumably but not necessarily the author of the certificate – testifies to both propositions.A recent opinion usefully summarizing the decisions on this matter, and coming to the proper result, is United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:57 pm by LindaMBeale
United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:31 am by Greenberg Stone and Urbano
United States, the Florida Supreme Court has subsequently agreed in a different case that caps on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits constitutes a violation of the equal protection clause of our state’s constitution. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
The Oregon Supreme Court addressed this question in James Boldt v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:55 pm by Ilya Somin
Yet throughout the United States, government agencies increasingly rely on “civil forfeiture” to bolster their strained budgets. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:38 pm
  Remember, there are other jurisdictions in the United States that view these issues differently. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
By negative implication, the Commerce Clause prevents the states from enacting laws that discriminate against or unduly burden interstate Commerce. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  ********************   On April 7, 2020, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its long awaited decision in Arkansas Teachers Retirement System v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
On November 7, 2011, a criminal complaint was filed against Patrick Ricciardi in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:18 pm
The Solicitor states that the applicant has not explained where else the zero angle of attack in step (72) could come from, but the applicant responds that he does not bear the burden of proving what Biggers teaches. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:50 am by Brandon Kain
As before, the burden remains on the party resisting jurisdiction to demonstrate that there is a clearly more appropriate forum. [read post]