Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 8181 - 8200 of 32,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 12:24 pm by Peter Margulies
It will not include most overseas applicants for refugee status, who do not fit under any of these rubrics and lack any previous ties to the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
Take Justice Brennan's opinion for the Court in Malloy v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:00 am by Dale B. Halling
Kappos, 8 out of 9 Justices (i.e., everyone except Justice Scalia) signed onto an opinion that recognized that the patent claims in State Street displayed patent eligible subject matter. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:34 am
United States and other recent cases counsel against suppression when police act in “good faith. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration ordecision of this motion.06-713 ) WASHINGTON STATE GRANGE V. [read post]
8 May 2015, 12:07 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Neitzel, the Chief Justice seeks a federal court ruling that removing her from office would deprive her of property without due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (07-330), involving appellate judges’ ability to increase sentences sua sponte, and Irizarry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:45 am by Dennis Crouch
July 22, 2020 Memorandum for the United States. [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:48 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Most of the speculation focuses on whether the Supreme Court will issue a sweeping constitutional ruling like it did in the 1967 Loving v Virginia case [invalidating state laws that prohibited interracial marriage]. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:15 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices will consider whether a conviction for trying to impede or obstruct the administration of the tax laws requires the government to show that the defendant knew of a pending IRS action when he acted. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:50 pm by Sam Williams
The process is so onerous that Justice Antonin Scalia once listed it as the one thing that he would change about the United States Constitution in a C-Span interview. [read post]