Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 8201 - 8220 of 9,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 9:15 am
Yesterday, I did a post about the immediate impact of the United States Supreme Court's recent opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
  Don't be surprised if this one gets appealed up to the Supreme Court for a determination if it really does square with Hoffman. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
It's always perilous to try and generalize about a Supreme Court Term. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 1:40 pm
" And yesterday in The Arizona Daily Star, Howard Fischer had an article headlined "US high court: Strip search unjustified. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 1:15 pm
"Supreme Court Sides With Arizona in Language Case": This article appeared yesterday in The New York Times. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:56 pm
Supreme Court today ruled that school officials violated the constitutional rights of a 13-year-old Arizona girl when they strip searched her based on a classmate's uncorroborated accusation that she previously possessed ibuprofen. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens (above left), concurring in part and dissenting in part yesterday in Safford United School District #1 v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
In 1988, though, the Supreme Court reversed that conclusion. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Supreme Court on Thursday said that the strip search of an Arizona middle school girl in pursuit of drugs in 2003 was a violation of her Fourth Amendment right against improper search and seizure. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:14 pm
Ginsburg: Court needs another woman [USA Today] Settle Down, Clarence [True/Slant] Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search [New York Times] Supreme Court Decision [PDF] Sponsored Topics: Strip search - Supreme court - Supreme Court of the United States - New York Times - Government [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:30 pm by Gary D. Sparks
In an 8-1 vote, the United States Supreme Court today held that Arizona school officials who in 2003 strip-searched a 13-year-old girl while looking for prescription medications went too far and violated her Fourth Amendment privacy right that protects against unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:54 am
The American Constitution Society's blog reports: The Supreme Court ruled today that Arizona public school officials violated the constitutional rights of a teenage girl when they searched her for prescription-strength ibuprofen. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:47 am
The Supreme Court recently ruled that a school's strip search of an Arizona teenage girl accused of having prescription-strength ibuprofen was illegal. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:33 am
"Strip search of teen was unconstitutional, Supreme Court rules; The high court says the search of a 13-year-old girl at an Arizona middle school was unjustified; But justices reject the suit against school employees, saying the law had not been clear": David G. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:24 am
As reported by the Wall Street Journal (click  here), the Supreme Court ruled that strip-searching a 13-year-old girl in a hunt for ibuprofen violated the Fourth Amendment ban on “unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:11 am
Supreme Court ruled today on a case that originated in Arizona. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 10:15 am
Supreme Court took a major step toward ending a 17-year legal battle today, deciding Arizona has done enough to help students who haven't learned to speak, read or write English. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:56 am
6-25-2009 Arizona:The Supreme Court today ruled that school officials violated the constitutional rights of a 13-year-old Arizona girl when they strip searched her based on a classmate's uncorroborated accusation that she previously possessed ibuprofen. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
In an eight-to-one decision, the Supreme Court ruled this morning thaat “a school’s strip search of an Arizona teenage girl accused of having prescription-strength ibuprofen was illegal. [read post]