Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 8201 - 8220 of 10,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2010, 4:12 am by Lawrence Solum
The key is what relationship a right must stand to citizens of the United States to count. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:02 pm by Steven Boutwell
  Section 909 (g) states that “[c]ompensation under the [the LHWCA] to aliens not residents (or about to become nonresidents) of the United States or Canada shall be the same in amount as provided for residents. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:05 am by Kelly
The bill has been introduced – and passed – before. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:02 pm
United States, essentially ruling that the US Department of Commerce could not concurrently apply countervailing duties (CVDs) and antidumping (AD) duties to imports from China, as long as China continues to be designated a "non-market economy" under the US antidumping law. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
EPA which vacated an EPA ruling that excluded the application of pesticides to, over, or near, waters of the United States from permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:27 am by Rich Cassidy
Larry Tribe is one of the leading constitutional law scholars in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:49 pm by Kelly
Playables (1709 Blog) (IPKat) United States US Patents – Decisions ITC issues final determination finding violation of 19 USC § 1337 and terminates investigation in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) brought by Rambus (ITC Law Blog) (ITC 337 Update) District Court Delaware: Source code for future products is discoverable: BigBand Networks Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:05 am by Mairead Enright
The Supreme Court judgment of McD v L [2009] IESC 81 makes clear that “[t]here is no institution in Ireland of a de facto family. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm by Big Tent Democrat
This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Gov­ernment of the United States, but will in­clude every other class of persons.? [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm by Rosalind English
RB (Algeria)-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10; [2009] 2 WLR 512 says not. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:47 am by Josh Wright
”  Recall the Supreme Court’s decision in Granholm v. [read post]