Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 8201 - 8220 of 44,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2019, 5:11 am by Robert Margolis
Case date: 09 December 2019 Case number: No. 19-1760 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:53 am
The Patent Act grants patent owners the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling any patented invention in the United States. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
By granting review in yet another state sentencing case, California v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:13 am
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:57 am by Kent Scheidegger
As noted in Bill's post, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court hears a family law case, so the Court's June, 2011, ruling in Turner v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 1:23 pm by Peter Spiro
Florida, striking down state statutes sentencing juveniles to life without parole for crimes other than homicide: [A]s petitioner contends and respondent does not contest, the United States is the only Nation that imposes life without parole sentences on juvenile nonhomicide offenders. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am by Jennifer Lynch
United States, explicitly recognized the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant for access to cell site location information. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm by Wolfgang Demino
George, for Plaintiff-Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.Before: SMITH, BARKSDALE, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.STEPHEN A. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:16 pm by Vincent E. McGeary
The dissent argued that the certified order from the Court of Federal Claims did not confer appellate jurisdiction over the earlier dismissal of infringement claims against the United States, citing United States v. [read post]