Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Pp. 19-20. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 12:52 am
Esparza, No. 07-50293 (1-20-09). [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 6:53 pm
" (8) Notably, Section 19(d)(1) does not condition the Secretary of State's assumption of the powers and duties of the office of President on resignation of her current office, nor does elevation of the Secretary of State raise any constitutional issue of interbranch appointment. (9) The term of office of the Secretary of State does not automatically terminate at noon on the 20th day of January. (10) On January 20, 2009, Condoleeza Rice was (and… [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 7:40 pm
This is the fourth and final post on the nuts and bolts of defending a product liability case in California. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
"This conclusion was further supported by a policy statement that provides that a reduction is not authorized under § 3582(c)(2) if the Guideline amendment "does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range because of the operation of another guideline or statutory provision" such as a statutory mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:40 am
Mar. 20, 2007); Russo v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
"Hindsight is always 20/20," he said. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 8:58 am
1. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:52 pm
This does NOT mean that you MUST give a blood or breath sample. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:38 pm
On October 14, 2008, a federal district court in New York denied defendant pharmaceutical companies' motion for summary judgment after finding genuine issues of fact existed as to whether 1) the sham exception to antitrust immunity under the Noerr-Penington doctrine applied to defendants' filing of a Citizen-Petition to the FDA to block the approval of generic drug manufacturers' applications; and 2) defendants' Petition in… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:49 am
Najar, 451 F.3d 710, 712-20 (10th Cir. 2006), with similar facts. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 7:13 pm
Despite the procedural differences and the considerable discretion asso-ciated with juvenile proceedings, juveniles have many of the rights and protections provided defendants in adult criminal proceedings. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 11:46 am
The defendant was accused of cutting another man with the bottle during a dispute over $20. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 7:47 pm
Once again Medtronic leads the charge.The court made the following significant rulings:(1) The Class I FDA recall that the Medtronic leads underwent did not deprive the defendant of its preemption defense. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
On June 20, 2008, several former prosecutors had come out in support of the legislation. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:00 pm
We have been at this charade for better than 20 years. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
1-2.) [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
P 20. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 9:48 am
Pareto's 80/20 rule applies just as much to litigation as it does to any other business. [read post]
