Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 8201 - 8220 of 15,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2014, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his recent decision in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case of Harvey v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:33 am by Isaac
The United States Supreme Court (USSC) is today hearing oral arguments in Alice Corp v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Bedessee Imports Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 12:26 pm by John C. Manoog III
Recent NHTSA figures indicated that almost 22 million vehicles were recalled in 2013 in 632 separate recalls. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 12:40 pm by John Gregory
One would have thought that nearly 30 years after this numbering system became standard, courts and lawyers would have figured it out. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:34 am by INFORRM
Consequently, the public’s right to information was limited to details pertaining to a public figure’s official life (“vie officielle”) or to information and images either (1) voluntarily revealed by the public figure or (2) which relate to a topical event or debate of general interest. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 4:17 am by SHG
  In the absence of a warrant for her arrest, Payton v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:51 am by Amy Howe
” Yesterday the Court issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Leland Yee, a prominent figure in California's Democratic legislative majority, was arrested in a federal corruption investigation Wednesday along with an ostentatious gangster known as "Shrimp Boy" -- who insisted that he had gone straight -- and two dozen of their alleged associates.An affidavit filed in federal court in San Francisco by FBI Special Agent Emmanuel V. [read post]
Related Issues: Mass Surveillance TechnologiesState Surveillance & Human RightsState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: Kidane v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 4:21 am by SHG
  Josh Blackman posts about what he calls Posner’s “fashion show” in his consideration of the appeal in Mitchell v. [read post]