Search for: "House v. State"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 25,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2023, 5:49 am
Watkins cited Ronnie Lee Johnson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Now that we have the reports from the third and final day of the meeting in Salt Lake City of ECUSA's Executive Council, we are finally able to fill in the picture of what is going on among the Church's elected and appointed officials. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:22 am
And so begins its decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 8:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of UtahOpinion Date: 7/2/09Cite: Bad Ass Coffee Co. of Hawaii, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
Texas, two individuals and 18 states are once again asking the Supreme Court to do what it refused to do eight years ago in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:57 am
Among the many provision in the Act is language to overrule the Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems Corp v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 11:10 am
Against the odds, and the wishes of police unions, HB 2754 (White) limiting arrests for fine-only Class-C misdemeanor violations is scheduled for a floor vote in the Texas House tomorrow (though it's about 100 bills down on the calendar, and so could be pushed til Tuesday).The legislation has its roots in the US Supreme Court case, Atwater v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:51 am
MONTEE v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 2:53 pm
Under Coleman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
The last six weeks have seen some important or at least interesting decisions under the Fair Housing Act and Title III of the ADA. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:03 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:25 pm
In Taumoepeau v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
Frenkel, then a Cisco in-house lawyer blogging anonymously as the Patent Troll Tracker, wrote two posts about the case, ESN v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
Lord Sumption also rejected the approaches taken at first instance and by the Court of Appeal in holding that the defence of illegality was a rule of law and that previous attempts to introduce a discretionary element into the doctrine had been expressly rejected by the House of Lords in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Specht v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 11:47 am
This would be to under-state their involvement. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Late last week, in Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:43 pm
(The House GOP leaders have their own petition pending, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 5:29 am
State v. [read post]
