Search for: "In Re Doe I"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 70,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm
I get it.Your friend seems psyched. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 11:15 am
In a story I'd missed when it came out, the Houston Chronicle reported the agency has no "statistics showing there was a crime problem at TDHCA-backed housing" and does not even track that information. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 4:07 am
" Does he think we're proto-idiots? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:36 pm
He does not represent a danger to anyone. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:34 pm
What does this have to do with community associations? [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
But it's not a felony to possess it, at least if you're 21 and it's under an ounce.There is, in fact, a strong argument that that's exactly what the text of the statute provides.So why does the California Supreme Court basically have to grant review? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:11 am
I wonder if an attorney gets CLE credit for using Mr. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 5:20 am
" What does he mean "we"? [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:50 am
Why does it have to be like that? [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
It does have links across the top of that page and one of them is labeled "store. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:38 am
" It seems like many images I've seen from right wingers, conveying the message that you're armed and you will defend yourself.The word "vengeance" muddies the message, because it implies that you are not defending yourself against a present physical threat but you're looking at the past, totaling up resentment for accumulated wrongs, and deciding to inflict a punishment you've deemed appropriate. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 6:27 am
The sometimes threadbare political axiom 'if you’re explaining, you’re losing' comes to mind.... [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 12:24 pm
The problem arises from giving res judicata effect to a leave denial when the COA does not give full consideration to the case in the first place. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 7:35 am
I don't know how you can compare a person who's actually been carrying out the responsibilities of the presidency with someone you're only asked to imagine as President. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
And California does indeed have such a rule.But I'll nonetheless mention that this rule contains important exceptions, including one that'd be applicable here. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 8:53 pm
You're almost there; the exam will be over before you know it. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:35 am
(I’m not actually sure why Joel thinks this story has gone unnoticed; plenty of outlets have covered it!) [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
We're cool. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:34 pm
You’re being watched. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 6:08 pm
In re Xcaliber Int'l Ltd., Serial No. 78360389 (September 15, 2006) [not citable].Examining Attorney John S. [read post]
