Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 8201 - 8220
of 18,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Harold Dutton has filed legislation on this score in years past, but it's never seemed to gain momentum.)If we're going to take on these transparency issues, let's take on all of them. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Over at Concurring Opinions, Tuan Samahon, Villanova Law, draws upon Judge Oliver Gasch’s in addressing the likelihood that then-Judge Scalia wrote the per curiam for a three-judge district court that Chief Justice Burger drew upon holding the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act unconstitutional in Bowsher v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:50 pm
Opinion in re Sharpe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
K.C. and V.C. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
’ In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation, 536 F.3d 1049 (U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 4:19 am
” In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse remembers and discusses the case of Joshua Braam – the “poor Joshua” of Justice Harry Blackmun’s dissent in DeShaney v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
They’re not crazy. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 4:09 am
It stems from a Supreme Court decision from 1989, DeShaney v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:46 pm
Supreme Court held on June 26, in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:27 am
Re-scheduled from the January 12 snow cancellation. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
No re-presentment was made to the grand jury. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am
Indeed, the vicious fight in Congress and the legal attacks on the ACA (that appeared to have largely been ended by Chief Justice Roberts’ “SCOTUScare” opinion in King v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:01 am
” Justice Edward White Justice White gave as his rationale a citation from a previous case [United States v. [read post]
