Search for: "John Doe T" Results 8201 - 8220 of 22,983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2016, 5:30 pm
"Supreme Court won't investigate leaks": Patrick Marley of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has an article that begins, "The Wisconsin Supreme Court declined Monday to appoint a special master to investigate leaks from a long-running John Doe probe to a newspaper, leaving it to Attorney General Brad Schimel to look into it on his own. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 10:42 am by Timothy Edgar
  If he does not mean them, let him say so. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:27 am by Bill Otis
 One does not have to be a genius to figure out what happens in that situation. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:21 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
A “John Doe” summons can only be served by the IRS after a federal court gives approval. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm by Jimmy Chalk
First, it's important to note that whatever President Trump does to reimpose sanctions within his authority, those sanctions probably wouldn’t have the same bite that they did before the JCPOA. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 11:37 am by Ron Coleman
 As John asks: After this decision, is there any “use” of a trademark or services mark that does not satisfy the “use in commerce” requirement? [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 1:21 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Numerous randomized clinical trials espouse the benefits of medical marijuana, but most don’t look specifically at older adults. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 7:56 am by Molly Runkle
Sotomayor reacted cautiously, stating that “we can’t afford for a president to fail” and that “we have to support that which he does which is right and help guide him to those right decisions. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:28 am by Jon Hyman
The one employment-law question I’ve been asked most since waking up last Wednesday to the reality that The Donald will be The President (aside from, “How did this happen,” and for that I direct you to John Oliver’s excellent 30-minute soliloquy of an answer from his Sunday night HBO program—warning, language NSFW) is, “Does this mean that the new FLSA salary test won’t go into effect? [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:28 am by Jon Hyman
The one employment-law question I’ve been asked most since waking up last Wednesday to the reality that The Donald will be The President (aside from, “How did this happen,” and for that I direct you to John Oliver’s excellent 30-minute soliloquy of an answer from his Sunday night HBO program—warning, language NSFW) is, “Does this mean that the new FLSA salary test won’t go into effect? [read post]