Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8201 - 8220 of 21,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
We emphasize, moreover, that, at this stage of the case, it is not our function to decide whether Sawant is liable for defaming Plaintiffs. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
General Business Law § 70, as well as unlawful pretexting and invasion of defendant's privacy.4. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:05 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
In addition, the Court found that defendant could “only be liable for nuisance if Plaintiffs were able to establish that Wolf’s acts constituted misfeasance rather than nonfeasance—in other words, if Wolf were the creator of the dangerous condition. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
In other words, if one defendant was 10 percent liable, they would be responsible for contributing 10 percent of the award to plaintiff. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:35 am by Scott Andrews
In a recent opinion from the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, the plaintiff appealed a judgment from a trial court granting summary judgment on behalf of the defendant, a daycare center. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:49 pm by Kenneth Anderson
It is important to note that this is all logically prior to Sosa’s requirements. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  As you might have gathered, the defendant took the bonding company’s name a little too literally, and never showed up for trial. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:35 pm by John C. Manoog III
The plaintiff further alleged that the defendant was liable for fraudulent concealment and violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, codified at Mass. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:09 am by emagraken
Dhalla) the Defendant made a lane change into the Plaintiff’s lane of travel. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:06 pm by Marcel Pemsel
Audi sued the defendant before the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Regional Court of Warsaw) for trade mark infringement. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:26 pm by James Yang
Simply put, defendants who would have been found liable for inducement of infringement is now no longer liable for patent infringement. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:10 am
The more serious the injuries are, it stands to reason the defendant could potentially be liable for large sums of money regarding compensation. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 11:23 am by Eugene Volokh
The court notes further that there is a curious unreality about defendants’ request to explore Saperstein’s bias towards defendants. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 4:21 am by Justin K. Beyer
  Caruso, in turn, turned over this Facebook post (as well as others he received from Ronco) to Stacy Quagliana, one of the named defendants and MONOC’s Executive Director of Administration. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:03 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Moreover, an invitee cannot maintain a negligence suit merely from a showing that an injury was sustained in the defendants building. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
  As the opinion reflects, both sides hotly contested that issue in their briefs … In concurring, Judge Sykes was unimpressed with the majority’s reasoning based on impecunious defendants (because poor defendants should not have lesser rights than well-heeled ones). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 11:40 am by Steven Cohen
  The plaintiffs Andrea Savidge and Beth Lynch, former employees of the defendant, claim that Pharm-Save should be held liable for a data-breach in which sensitive and personal information was compromised. [read post]