Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 8,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2007, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:30 pm
See Toibb [v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:33 am
"[W]e deem these challenges waived and consider them no further," was all the court needed to say. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
Consider this language from a First Circuit opinion in Albathani v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
It claimed that it has drawn attention to the tortoise shell design in direct mailings, coupons, and store event invitations.The Board perceptively observed that [w]hether a design is merely ornamental or functions as a trademark is a matter of public perception. [read post]
Weakening Corporate Governance: Delaware Courts and the Contored Exception to the Demand Requirement
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
W. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
Twombly v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:41 am
Granger, Respondent v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:24 am
As in Bowles, "[w]e cannot allow such manipulation to be rewarded. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:44 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 10:56 am
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 12:19 am
State v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
There is also the ancillary issue of licensing costs, which should bear some sensible relationship to the actual benefit that a copyright or patent provides to society, otherwise the copyright or patent is - as a matter of simple economics - not worth protecting.In The Two Faces Of Perfect 10 v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
George v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:11 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Wechsler v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 8:16 am
v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:53 pm
Programming Found., Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:55 am
There is no necessary contradiction here: George W. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:43 pm
Industrial Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
Charles W. [read post]
