Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 8201 - 8220 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The Colloquium marked the 60th anniversary of the trial Briggs v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:12 am by admin
marks a renewed effort on the part of Congress to pass such a bill after similar legislation (S. 3804) passed the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously, but failed to pass in the full Senate last session (81 PTCJ 744, 4/8/11; 81 PTCJ 513, 2/25/11). [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:08 pm by George M. Wallace
 A copy of the Complaint has been uploaded by [defendant] Mark Bennett, here. [read post]
21 May 2011, 4:25 am by Guest Blogger
This characterization of participation in hostilities is not only contrary to international law, but harms the interests of the United States in other theaters of operation. [read post]
19 May 2011, 11:39 am by Charles Internicola
 Irreparable harm is typically equated with a harm for which a future "monetary award" cannot serve as proper or adequate compensation. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:27 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Under Calder, the court gauges whether the defendant: 1)committed an intentional act, 2)expressly aimed at the forum state,  3)causing harm that the defendant knows is likely to be suffered in the forum state.Judge Whyte ruled against Facebook because it failed to show Teachbook's conduct was "expressly aimed" at California. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm by Brian Cuban
” or as Rakofsky calls it “Intentional Infliction Of Emotional Harm”. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:34 am by Venkat
Tigerlogic dispute over the "POST POST" mark for "social search services" touches on this: "Social Search Services Duel Over "Post Post" Mark -- Boathouse Group v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:29 am by Walter Reaves
That issue has yet to be completely settled (Mark Bennett has discussed a Houston case going the other way) and requires a discussion of retroactivity which is beyond the scope of this post. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:19 pm
Miles also stated that he believed that trade mark is "being tainted by what others in copyright" are experiencing (i.e. large damages awards against individuals).Miles stated that what has been the more difficult area of practice in recent years is that where clients have a valuable mark being used by another party in circumstance where there is no trade mark use, no dilution and no real trade mark harm but where the use is still potentially… [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:08 pm by Jonathan Bailey
In fact, it may do more harm than good.Not only is the quality of education at stake, but so is the reputation of the graduates, current and prior, as they go into the world.After all, no one wants a degree from a school that is perceived as “cheaters’ haven” and schools owe it to those who earned their degrees to defend the honor that comes with as much as they can.Have a copyright question? [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The fabrication of counterfeit money, whether coin or paper, counterfeit titles or coupons of the public debt created by national, State, provincial, territorial, local or municipal administrations, bank notes or other instruments of public credit, counterfeit seals, stamps, dies and other marks of State or public administration offices and the utterance, circulation or fraudulent use of the above-mentioned objects. 15. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Malicious wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm with premeditation. 3. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:29 am by Sean Wajert
  His tenure as head of the ABA has been marked by a number of important initiatives, and at ALI he spoke of assaults on the important principle of equal justice under law. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
He stated that although this was a copyright decision and arguably not relevant to trade mark law, the lower courts have upheld this decision in relation to trade mark cases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
(Although a client may want you to speak with certain friends or family, you should decide whether this could potentially harm the case. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:04 pm by Robert Oszakiewski
It is to be another version of TSCA, far less harmful but having a law that does cover the bases. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:12 am
Democratic Senator Roy Herron of Dresden stated that, "We are harming the victims and protecting the wrongdoers. [read post]