Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8201 - 8220
of 21,695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2011, 3:01 am
Abakporo further alleges that this purported George Alston gave him a New York State Identification Card and the checks which had been issued by Pierre. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm
In Crest et al v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 5:56 am
Last but not least, Part V, “Trademarks, Certification Marks and Standards” starts with Chapter 12 “Trademarks, Certification Marks and Technical Standards” authored by Jorge L. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:02 pm
Op. at 9 (quoting Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
If you thought that the Google AdWords saga ended when the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) ruled that hosting keywords corresponding to trade marks does not amount to a “use in the course of trade” that the right owner can prevent [Google France v Louis Vuitton Mattelier, Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08], then you may want to think twice. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:03 am
Thomas, United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
12 May 2017, 9:38 am
In Kern v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 9:03 am
" Moore v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:21 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 10:38 am
” Id. at 828 n. 9 (quoting Heard, 491 F.2d at 3) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:33 pm
Ass'n. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
App. at 168 (Order Granting Mot. to Suppress at 7) (internal quotation marks omitted).The district court thereafter set the matter for trial. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
IMatthew David Brozik blogged here about Tiffany v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 9:40 am
Facts: This case (Michael Rowan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:10 am
Rogers v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
Like the earlier cases, this one, Reynolds v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:45 pm
In a recently published opinion, Combs v. [read post]
