Search for: "Opened in Error"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 10,828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 8:23 am
The issue remains open: "We only review this issue for plain error, since [D] failed to object at the district court. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:09 am
", Scrivener's Error "Federal Judge Rejects Google Books Settlement, But Leaves Door Open to Revision", ACS Blog Giovanna Occhipinti Trigona, "Google book search choices", Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2011) 6(4): 262-273 (abstract here) "Defeated Book Settlement 'a Victory for Copyright', The Bookseller. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:43 pm
” http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/does-googles-android-violate-linuxs-copyright/8497. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:12 pm
Incorporating a proximate causation requirement where none exists is a clear and indisputable error. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
Bribery Act - http://tinyurl.com/45cu96a (Chris Johnson) Litigation Claims Trends: Errors and Insights – http://tinyurl.com/465r2ma (Dan Pinnington) Now That Everything Is Collected, What Manner and Form to Produce It? [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:32 am
He argued that China’s leaders in the 1990s had been genuinely committed to a more open economy and downsizing the state sector. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:23 pm
If a Supreme Court decision, after the fact of the police action, makes what they did unconstitutional, that can’t possibly have a deterrent effect, so the police error should be excused under the “good faith” exception to the rule, he argued. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
The Board describes presumptive doubt as an awareness of the risk that the figures could be affected by error or dishonesty and contrasts it with a neutral mindset in which the auditor neither accepts management’s figures and explanations in a neutral way nor assumes that there is an error or misstatement.Noting that the term presumptive doubt is not used in the international auditing standards, PwC believes that having an initial mindset of presumptive doubt reflects an… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:31 am
"By requiring inquiry as to whether the verdict is the jury's verdict, K.S.A. 22-3421 gives jury members the opportunity to express disagreement with or dissent from the verdict in open court. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
However, Mabray testified it was possible he overlooked the notice as April through June were especially busy months on the farm during which he "might have stuff sit on [his] desk for a couple of weeks before it gets opened. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
” That was the opening of a recent article in the Washington Post. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
That was the opening of a recent article in the Washington Post. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:35 am
" That was the opening of a recent article in the Washington Post. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:07 am
If the district court truly believed that “Treacy could not fully exercise his Confrontation Clause rights” due to the reporter’s “assertion of the privilege, it ought to have” either quashed the subpoena or stricken the reporter’s direct testimony.A confrontation error does not require reversal if the government establishes that the error was “harmless beyond a reasonable doubt,” after assuming that the “damaging potential of… [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:32 am
The Court held that negligently filling out an insurance application opens an agent to liability. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
This is second part of Alastair Mullis’ study of the Draft Defamation Bill. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
At 10 a.m. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Since neither Kodak nor OUII could show a change of fact or law, the ALJ determined that any party asking for a modification of the claim construction would bear the burden of showing that there had been a clear error of law or a manifest injustice with respect to the claim construction set forth in the original order. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 12:08 pm
The company points out that the plant’s operators could still have kept the reactor cool by opening the valves manually. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
The Government’s Defamation Bill was published on Tuesday 15th March 2011 and on the same day the Deputy Prime Minister took the opportunity, by way of media introduction of the new Bill, to issue a rallying call to freedom of speech: ‘In a modern, liberal and open society dissent should be celebrated, and debate should be raucous. [read post]
