Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 9:33 am
Unlike most other countries, Americans are protected from abusers of power by restrictions on police to arrest people only under specifically defined instances found in the Constitution and the criminal laws. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:10 am
The IEEE has gone as far as to suggest that the recent Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:19 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown in Hettinga v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:03 pm
In a recent case, NATALIE NICHOLS, v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:44 am
It is much easier for the prosecutor to introduce such evidence in an sexual assault trial.In the People v Watkins case, the Michigan Supreme Court, recognizing the irresolvable conflict between the evidentiary rule and the statute, held that the statute controls. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
But few people doubt today that a President can remove a Cabinet officer. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 5:25 pm
The case is Mayfield v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
This was the reality in Qureshi v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 8:58 am
This move represents a shift in the Court’s stare decisis jurisprudence, and would seem to overrule Casey v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Those alternatives would leave us a smaller, weaker, country, subject to alliances with foreign powers against each other – the biggest fear and reason for action of the people who wrote and ratified our Constitution. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:14 pm
I selected this because we've had a slew of questions about eminent domain in the last few weeks and people are generally always freaked out about the concept of government having power to take you house at the drop of a hat. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 9:30 am
It wasn’t until Nixon and Reagan started to split the labor movement on the anvil of race that the power of working people in America began to decline. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
And privacy rights cannot empower individuals nearly enough to close the power gap between people and the companies that possess individuals’ data. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:23 pm
Tire Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Richardson and Califano v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:29 am
Here's a copy of the case, Appin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
Isn’t legislative power nondelegable? [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
The government did, however, remind the panel of the constitutionality of the president ’s “inherent ” powers during wartime, i.e. the state secrets privilege will always be an obstacle to resolving FISA and/or the Separation of Powers questions. [read post]
