Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 12,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
In 1984 in Berkemer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 12:16 pm
(United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, August 7, 2012) A surprise in Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:21 am
Meanwhile, others abuse the system to receive free money[v] that is administered by one of the most wasteful and ineffective bodies—the American government—which charges a massive administration fee. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:15 pm
Hoggett v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Thanks to a court decision earlier this month, in Alf Naman Real Estate Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Thanks to a court decision earlier this month, in Alf Naman Real Estate Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 7:09 am
State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 6:59 pm
Hendow v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:35 pm
” The court on November 7 will hear the following cases (with the issue presented as stated on the court’s website): Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Despite other favorable rulings, State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Despite other favorable rulings, State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 6:44 pm
Hendow v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 4:44 pm
Below the police may likely choose a PBT in a DUI field investigation: • To determine or rule out DUI influence of alcohol v. drugs; • Drivers who may have a high alcohol tolerance level, and can perform field sobriety tests or other tasks to a greater degree than those with lower tolerance levels; • To detect if an underage 21 person is under the influence of any alcohol in violation of the state's Zero Tolerance law; • As a… [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 3:55 pm
The case name is Missouri v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
The proper vehicle for questioning the legality of field sobriety or breath tests “based merely on non-compliance with agency regulations governing the administration of such tests,” is a motion in limine, Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
The proper vehicle for questioning the legality of field sobriety or breath tests “based merely on non-compliance with agency regulations governing the administration of such tests,” is a motion in limine, Smith v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 12:12 pm
" The Second Circuit says the state regulation is legal and does not deny the students their rights under federal law.The case is Bryant v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 8:14 am
By Daniel RichardsonDaniels v. [read post]