Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8201 - 8220
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
The Supreme Court held that "Civil Service Law §105, subd.1(c), and Education Law §3022, subd. 2, are invalid insofar as they proscribe mere knowing membership without any showing of specific intent to further the unlawful aims of the Communist Party of the United States or of the State of New York. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm
Walton v Bank of Cal. (1963) 218 CA2d 527, 542. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:31 am
To take your own look at the 11th Circuit’s opinion in SEC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Enrico C. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:46 am
Almond v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
C-2012/03/47, dated May 28, 2012. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the definition provided by R 26(4), “plant variety” means any plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, which grouping, irrespective of whether the conditions for the grant of a plant variety right are fully met, can be (a) defined by the expression of the characteristics that results from a given genotype or combination of genotypes, (b) distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the said… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
Law Offices of Irene C. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:39 am
Law Offices of Irene C. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:56 am
(c) Regarding the pain experienced in his shoulder, Mr. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Finally, the Board held that the Association’s GML §207-c hearing proposal to permit a hearing officer to issue a binding decision, subject to review by the courts under CPLR Article 78, was mandatory under City of Watertown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
It found there to be a breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 and awarded EUR 5000 compensation to each applicant.Costache v Romania (27/3/12)Mr C petitioned the ECHR for breach of his rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention by reason of the State’s failure to remedy his inadequate housing situation and to allow him to remain in living conditions which were, on Mr C’s case, inhuman.Mr C struggled to find his own accommodation following the death… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:15 pm
It found there to be a breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 and awarded EUR 5000 compensation to each applicant.Costache v Romania (27/3/12)Mr C petitioned the ECHR for breach of his rights under Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention by reason of the State’s failure to remedy his inadequate housing situation and to allow him to remain in living conditions which were, on Mr C’s case, inhuman.Mr C struggled to find his own accommodation following the death… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm
In Commstop v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Prob C § 249.5 If you have any questions please call my office at (408) 866-8382 for a free consultation or email me at s.miri@mirilaw.com. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
Last month, in Hallanan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:30 am
Pretty Please In Oceanus Insurance Company v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
