Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 8201 - 8220 of 9,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2009, 11:31 am
My colleague Roger Alford has a fascinating post over at the blog Opinio Juris (available  here)  detailing a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case of Bauman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 10:17 am
  In Minnesota’s First Judicial District, the judges are consolidating all the source code cases before Judge Abrams. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Serv. 13,141, 2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,648Briefs and Other Related DocumentsCourt of Appeal, Fourth District, Division 3, California.Luther E. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 8:08 am
She is stating issues of the law that are wrong," he told the jury.The rare display of judicial pique resulted in a mistrial after state lawyers objected that his remarks could have improperly influenced jurors. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
In the past 12 months, district courts in the United States have issued substantive rulings on 19 motions to bifurcate liability from damages in patent cases. 11 were granted and 8 were denied.What is clear, however, is that district judges tend to have a preference based on past experience and they rarely deviate from that preference. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
Noting the substantial patent docket pending in the District of Delaware, Judge Robinson states that in her experience "discovery disputes related to document production on damages and the Daubert motion practice related to damages experts are a drain on scarce judicial resources. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:21 pm
Jordan of New Hanover County District Court granting joint legal custody and awarding liberal visitation rights to the adoptive parent in Boseman v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:26 pm
In order to qualify for appointment as a Judge of a High Court under Article 217(2)(a) a person must hold a "judicial office" which must be a part of the judicial service of the State. ....It is for the first time in the post-independent era that this Court is seized of a situation where it has to perform the painful duty of determining the eligibility of a person who has been appointed a Judge of High Court by the President… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:51 am
  The only “decision” of consequence by the Ohio Supreme Court this past week was the dismissal of the appeal from the 8th District’s decision in  State v. [read post]