Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 8201 - 8220 of 156,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
The opinions of other federal judges on a question of state law do not constitute "convincing evidence that the state supreme court would decide [an issue] differently," Vestar, 249 F.3d at 960, nor do those opinions contain any relevant "convincing evidence. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
As the FTC points out, given the abundance of state laws on which such interpretations could be based, this practice would likely result in a sea of inconsistent rulings. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:05 am by Lawrence Solum
Maltz (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School) has posted The Road to Rodriguez: Presidential Politics, Judicial Appointments, and the Contingent Nature of Constitutional Law (Virginia Law Review Online) on SSRN. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The decision is summarized below:1) It is not correct to contend that the Bombay High Court would not have the jurisdiction to restrain arbitral proceedings in Singapore merely due to the principle of comity. 2) The principle of comity merely provides that courts of one state or jurisdiction will give effect to the laws and judicial decisions of another state or jurisdiction not as a matter of obligation but out of mutual respect. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:05 am by Jeff Redding
  In particular, I have been thinking about it as a result of a gut feeling that the ‘2 v. 3’ debate is largely occurring within a vacuum, with not enough attention being paid to the current (beleaguered) state of the United States’ higher education system as a whole. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm by Unknown
Traditional Village of Togiak (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Banishment) United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm by NARF
Playing catch-up: Laws protecting cultural property in the United States need an update. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:45 am by Kate Fort
This right, however, has often been limited by federal courts under abstention doctrines, which means the state courts that are causing the abuses of the law are the only places to address the abuses of the law. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm by Steven Boutwell
Hollowell A recent United States Supreme Court decision handed down in May addressed what occurred when contract, bankruptcy, and intellectual property laws intersected.[1] In Mission Products Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]