Search for: "Thomas View" Results 8201 - 8220 of 12,029
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
Under this view, Congress would be unable to delegate to private parties, state governments, or international bodies. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
Justice Clarence Thomas has even explicitly called on the Court to rein in Section 230 immunity. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Justice Gorsuch authored a concurring opinion, which Justice Thomas joined. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
We have to learn not only to tolerate different points of view, but to cherish the din of democracy. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm by Alan Morrison
Justice Clarence Thomas agreed with the result, but not the majority’s rationale. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas would have said, basically, “almost always no. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
Becerra, 19-251, and Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In an opinion by Justice Thomas, the Court reasoned that a sentencing range is the equivalent of a punishment attached to a crime. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:35 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
” This “Good Samaritan” immunity is generally assumed to grant platforms effectively unlimited discretion in what they choose to moderate and remove (although more recent arguments, including from Justice Clarence Thomas, argue that immunity for removing content should be construed more narrowly, including when platforms censor political speech). [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am by Susan Brenner
  Reply Brief of Appellant James Thomas Flocker, U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
  I think there’s really only going to be clarity and a solid basis when the Court uses a test based upon reasonable anticipation, from the point of view of the speaker. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
  I think there’s really only going to be clarity and a solid basis when the Court uses a test based upon reasonable anticipation, from the point of view of the speaker. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
The testimony adduced at the hearing showed that [Maureen] was able to view the posts by visiting [Sammie’s] Facebook page because the two were still `friends’ on the social networking website. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by swhitehouse
Thomas Jefferson hoped our young nation would, if I may quote him, “crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Becerra[7] and was relied on by Justice Thomas in his concurrence (joined by Justice Gorsuch) in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ct. 1719, 1740–48 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). [9].Janus, 138 S. [read post]