Search for: "United States of America v "
Results 8201 - 8220
of 8,944
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2021, 12:05 pm
Google’s petition to the United States Supreme Court on the issue of the copyrightability of the Java SE API code was denied. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
" Dow Agrosciences L.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:22 am
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
” (Jones v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
In one case, Riegel v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:00 pm
As many in the United States struggle with unemployment, layoffs, furloughs, pay cuts, and other adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women struggle just to be treated just like everyone else. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 11:02 am
The country that has taken the place of the United States of America is a completely lawless country. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:16 am
New Process Steel, LP v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In the United States, however, the rate has steadily increased over the last twenty years. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 12:47 pm
Quotations from our interviews and survey responses reflect the views and personal experiences of individuals, not necessarily the experience of most ISOs across the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 5:37 pm
Says her judgment would result in “amnesty for everybody” and “her judgment is so bad that she should never be President of the United States. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
Source. ____ Q: Who was issued the first patent issued in North America, and for what? [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
These agreements create a framework for how companies should approach privacy in the United States and around the world. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm
[1] Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Like he would be in the later Plessy v. [read post]