Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 8201 - 8220 of 8,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Health, 275 F.3d 156, 167 (2d Cir.2001)); Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:52 am
Health, 275 F.3d 156, 167 (2d Cir.2001)); Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
May 20, 2008) In Fiddler, the defendants, AT&T Mobility, M-Qube, Inc. and Verisign, Inc., were sued in Illinois state court for allegedly making unauthorized charges for mobile telephone services. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
  Yesterday, the California Supreme Court in Cable Connection, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:38 am
(The United States is one of the leading producers in the world of rice, accounting for approximately 13% of the worldwide rice trade. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:10 pm
  The Memorandum Order in United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Douglas Floyd, THREE FACES OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AFTER THE DEMISE OF UNITED MINE WORKERS v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
By James Kachmar Last summer, I wrote about the appellate court’s decision in VL Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 7:43 am
Recently the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down an important decision regarding the enforceability of open software licences (in ROBERT JACOBSEN v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 7:22 pm
In the instant case, it would seem that reasonably prudent persons in the position of the defendants would see that their actions setting prices in the United States would negatively affect customers in the United States and elsewhere. [read post]