Search for: "WHITE v. STATE"
Results 8201 - 8220
of 12,015
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
The case is entitled State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
” In The Atlantic, Matt Barnum considers whether Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:02 pm
It is not often that the GWOT affects the world of T&E law, but the Supreme Court’s June 21 6-3 opinion in Holder v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 11:49 pm
Vincent Medical Center, and Doheny Villa Skilled Nursing Facility.On April 3, United States District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
This decision is worth reading for civil rights lawyers also, since the principles are the same.The case is House v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:45 am
White lecture March 10. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
”, invoking the aftermath of Worcester v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 4:20 am
" Most of reports correctly indicate that in 2003, the Supreme Court invalidated a Texas statute that prohibited homosexual conduct (see Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am
The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex marriage.Scholars of the… [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 9:29 am
Mississippi Transportation Commission v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 13: Divided TTAB Panel… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:18 pm
The juxtaposition of what the Constitution says about states entering the Union and what it does not say about them leaving, indicates that the door to the Union swings in but not out.Dorf also quotes the 1868 case of Texas v White where the Court said "The Constitution, in all its provisions, looks to an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm
" Address by the President of the United States, Delivered from his Office at the White House 1-2 (Sept. 24, 1957); 349 U.S. 294, 301 (1955). [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
White dismissed most of her claims. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am
On Dec. 7, 2020, after Chesebro sent Troupis another memo “on why it’s important all electors vote in all 6 contested states,” Troupis “bypassed” Clark and told Chesebro, “I have sent it to the White House this afternoon. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
” United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:10 am
April 22 marks the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
