Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 10,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:20 pm
The United States Supreme Court even ruled in Kimbrough v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm
(a) Section 40117(l)(7) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by striking `August 2, 2010. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:59 am
United States, No. 09-6822 (June 28, 2010). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:47 am
Congress makes the following findings: (1) States should be encouraged to simplify their sales and use tax systems. (2) As a matter of economic policy and basic fairness, similar sales transactions should be treated equally, without regard to the manner in which sales are transacted, whether in person, through the mail, over the telephone, on the Internet, or by other means. (3) Congress may facilitate such equal taxation consistent with the United States Supreme… [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:27 am
” which points out that the Act is unnecessary as these judgments are never enforced in the United States in any event. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am
(IP Whiteboard) A blueprint to nurture the creatives: it takes Brains… (IPKat) Pigs and protection: Old Spots get the TSG treatment (Class 46) United States US General Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Injunction in Bimbo Bakeries case maintained; secret muffin formula still safe? [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:49 pm
The bill would eliminate unconstitutional provisions of New York Penal Law § 240.35, the state loitering law. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:45 pm
” However, the United States Supreme Court upheld in its 1992 ruling on Quill Corp v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
(Greystone),15 and United Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
(See Phelps v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
A member of the military forces of the United States or of any state of the United States in the performance of official duties; or 3. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
A Washington Post reference page briefly summarizes the Court’s holding in Citizens United and what the bill would do in response. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 1:30 pm
(iii) The defendant was involved in the importation into the United States of a controlled substance. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am
Yesterday Senate Democrats were unable to break a Republican filibuster on the DISCLOSE Act, a legislative response to the Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:16 pm
The United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in the case of Ontario v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 7:56 am
448 F.3d 605 (2006) BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
