Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 15,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2011, 1:04 am
Read-the-whole-case rating: 2.Whelan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Conversely, if plaintiffs could import the “fraud on the market” presumption of reliance into non-securities contexts – such as consumer fraud/common-law fraud/warranty litigation against our drug/device clients – an invasion of class actions would follow like night follows day.It’s hardly surprising that, because we don’t want class actions certified against our clients, we’re not big fans of “fraud on the market,” and we want to remain… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
And let’s say that for the sake of argument, here and there, some conversations about paedophilia were sparked by reports of this injunction being discharged. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:48 am
The dust has started to settle following the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 handed down recently (IPKat post here). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
But these are the arguments that have emerged in my conversations with colleagues.) [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
., v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Galletta v Siu-Mei Yip, 271 AD2d 486, 486 [2d Dept 2000] ["Since the judgment entered upon the defendants' default in appearing at trial was obtained without the plaintiff's compliance with CPLR 321 (c), it must be vacated"]; McGregor v McGregor, 212 AD2d 955, 956 [3d Dept 1995] ["The record reveals no compliance with the leave or notice requirements of CPLR 321 (c). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:56 am
Lovino, Inc. v Lavallee Law Offs. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:19 am
., v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
" Dalia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:04 pm
Hauf v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
” In 2000, another high-profile case (Waldrep v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
The “loophole” in whistleblowing cases created by the case of Parkin v Sodexho (which allowed employees to claim that breach of their own employment contracts was an event capable of giving rise to a “Protected Disclosure”) is to be abolished. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm
See Estate of Winans (2010) 183 CA4th 102; Bernard v Foley (2006) 39 C4th 794; Estate of Odian (2006) 145 CA4th 152. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:49 am
The challenge here was one of political ideology, conservative v. socialist. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:27 am
Undaunted, the HR official responded that a face-to-face conversation would be necessary, and that she stood “ready to assist” once the employee felt capable of having one. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:12 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:27 pm
If you want to have your say on immigration you can take part in the online National Conversation. [read post]
