Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 33,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 3:57 am
" Barbaroza v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:44 am
For more on the history and significance of initiatives, check out the Initiative and Referendum Institute.The significance of the right of initiative and referendum was not lost on the California Supreme Court in the decision of Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court S207173. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:10 pm
Here is the abstract: On October 11, 2022, the Supreme Court will hear a case, National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
All California employers are required to post California Law Prohibits Workplace Discrimination and Harassment. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 8:57 am
All California employers are required to post California Law Prohibits Workplace Discrimination and Harassment. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 2:45 pm
By Eric Goldman National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm
Saluskin (Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) California v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 5:12 am
From a brief filed by the California Attorney General’s office in Ogilvie v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:26 am
In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports on one of the grants, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:59 am
They report on the recent class certification in National Federation of the Blind v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
Yates of University of Southern California Rossier School of Education and Charles E. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 1:27 pm
The California Court’s decision is in keeping with the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in City of Ontario v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:18 am
This decision was based on the decision of the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:18 am
This decision was based on the decision of the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
Like most jurisdictions, California requires convicted sex offenders to register as a means of enabling law enforcement to manage the serious risk to the public of recidivism. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 7:13 pm
Massoyan v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 12:01 am
The Cato Institute, the National Federation of Independent Business, the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, and the Reason Foundation have filed an amicus brief in Horne v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 am
Judge Breyer of the Northern District of California had none of it. [read post]
