Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 8221 - 8240 of 25,654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2018, 8:13 pm by Florian Mueller
In connection with the FTC's antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm, Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California crafted a "Christmas present" for Apple that the iPhone maker would probably have liked to return to the shop immediately: a sanctions order ($25K per day starting December 16) and a December 29 deadline for the production of documents. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:51 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[v] The sentencing phase took seven days, almost all of it consumed by the victims taking center stage. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:49 am by Edith Roberts
United States and United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 8:44 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Nordyke v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh reports that one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Some 40 or so years later, Chairman Clayton’s regeneration of Judge Sporkin’s gatekeeper liability lays the regulatory foundation for a successful and vast SEC ICO assault, which will leave some ICO lawyers looking over their shoulders, and others perhaps dashing for cover. 1970s:  SEC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am by Anthony Gaughan
United States, "[N]ever before has the United States sought to enjoin a newspaper from publishing information in its possession. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:30 am by SHG
We can now make direct comparisons between the United States and poor countries. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:29 am by Scott Bomboy
Then on Tuesday, February 27, the Court gets another big case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 1:30 am by Paul Cassell
United States, 510 U.S. 540, 550–51 (1994) (internal quotations omitted). [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
United States The ongoing debate in the United States over the implementation of net neutrality, following the Federal Communications Commission decision to repeal enforcement laws, continues following AT&T releasing a statement in support of legislative change. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Lastly, Kaspersky claims that it has standing to assert Fifth Amendment due process rights because it has “substantial connections” to the United States based on its employment of 300 people in Massachusetts and its sales to customers and thus, comes under the framework announced in United States v. [read post]