Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 12,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 9:25 am
("A", "B", and "C" are letter grades, while a "V" rating means that the firm is ethical.) [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:10 am
A recent decision concluded that the designated officer does not owe a duty to the third party claimant under state law, nor through vicarious liability. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
I. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
In this week’s case (Coutakis v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:15 am
Alamdar’s status as litigation guardian does not impact the outcome of this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is DFSB Kollective Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
And, the court states, and I quote: “An attempt to dupe the Court into a premature ruling will not serve as the basis to deny FBT an opportunity to challenge Defendants’ accounting practices. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:44 pm
(I'm sure they have some reason for doing so; maybe Barnes v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am
Or that I care if it does not.This is the fourth Independence Day post since I began this blog in 2009. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:25 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
App. 253, 704 S.E.2d 886 (Georgia Court of Appeals 2010) (`Just because an officer has the authority to make a search of the data stored on a cell phone . . . does not mean he has the authority to sift through all of the data stored on the phone (that is, to open and view all of the sub-containers of data stored therein). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:53 pm
In the recent case of Freeway Properties Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
Rearden LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:52 am
The court makes this point very interestingly, in a way that I expect both plaintiffs and defendants will cite: "[S]imply having the status of an employee does not make the employer liable to a claim for overtime compensation or denial of breaks. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
Its dryness, however, does not belittle the importance of the case I am going to discuss. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:15 am
That I have the known capacity to litigate appeals for years (check my Westlaw profile, and of course, the drawn out history of Penguin v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
I’ll start with Parker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
The case is Marcus v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
§ 1395y(b)(3)(A) does not apply to MA Plans; (2) the secondary payer provisions of the Medicare Advantage program, (found in 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
§ 1395y(b)(3)(A) does not apply to MA Plans; (2) the secondary payer provisions of the Medicare Advantage program, (found in 42 U.S.C. [read post]
