Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 8221 - 8240 of 15,449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2021, 8:48 am by Tia Sewell
Reg. 84130 (December 23, 2020), as soon as possible; “Strengthening Transparency in Pivotal Science Underlying Significant Regulatory Actions and Influential Scientific Information,” 86 Fed. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 10:57 am by Unknown
Commenters are encouraged to raise any positions or views that are not elicited by the more detailed questions further below. 1. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But Fleming does not grapple with the enormous volume of scholarship examining the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
Sept. 23, 2010) (following plain meaning, finding nothing absurd about the result); Wallace v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am by Carolina Attorneys
COA19-24 Filed: 1 October 2019 Vance County, No. 07 CRS 50717, 50725 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
  Friday, October 23, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.: CSIS will host a live webcast about how COVID-19 has exacerbated poverty and economic inequality worldwide. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
As it originally emerged, the doctrine appeared to be only a rule of statutory construction that carved out an exception from the Chevron doctrine.[10] In Justice Scalia’s colorful words, Congress explains its major policy choices and “does not … hide elephants in mouseholes. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  It would be a shame if premature overselling of risky policies or settlement disputes led to a bubble popping and a painful contraction. [1] See Aviva Will & David M. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Yet, it does not justify an interpretation of the Constitution that tolerates let alone sustains corporate infringement of individual rights and encroachment on governmental powers. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:56 am by Russell Knight
This is a tax on money the maintenance payor does not even get to keep. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:40 am by Mario Zúñiga
In order to promote competition in digital markets,[1] Latin American countries should not copy and paste “solutions” from other jurisdictions, but rather design their own set of policies. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
Carnival’s expressio unius-style argument that s 5(1)(g) does not support the passengers’ case because the unfair contracts prohibition is not predicated on ‘engaging in’ any conduct, wher [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 11:37 am by Tobias Lutzi
The CJEU then had to deal with the question of whether this manner of incorporating a jurisdiction clause satisfies the conditions of Article 23(1) and (2) of the Lugano II Convention, which are identical to Article 23(1) and (2) of the Brussels I Regulation. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:23 am by Elena Chachko
Even if it does not, however, the Council will not be precluded from keeping both organizations on the sanctions list. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 7:05 am
In particular, there does not appear to be a comparable example of a great power (or multiple powers) rising within a normative framework not of its own making, where that normative framework has not undergone substantial change or revolution as a result of the new power’s values and interests. 32 As former Treasury Sec. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:08 am
”Petitions for Declaratory Ruling on Regulatory Status of Wireless Messaging Service, Declaratory Ruling, FCC 18-178, ¶45, p. 23 (rel. [read post]