Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 8221 - 8240 of 61,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Respondent (“Servier”) was granted a patent (“the Patent”), which related to medical drugs, by the European Patent Office (“EPO”). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:53 am by Eric S. Solotoff
Since the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
Sure, it was a good day for patent nerds as the court granted in one-time relist SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
  On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
  The plaintiff moved to remand the action to state court, which the District Court granted. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
The Court assured that full review would go forward in a granted case involving federal preemption of claims under state law from harms due to medical devices. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 8:29 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
District Court for the District of Maryland granted final approval of the settlement agreement in J.O.P. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:56 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case is McComish, et al., v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:49 pm by Mark L. McNamara
On January 22, 2018, the United States Supreme Court granted review of the Petitioner’s writ of certiorari in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 9:34 am by Arthur F. Coon
On October 23, 2020, the California Supreme Court issued an order extending until December 7, 2020, or the date upon which review is either granted or denied, the time for granting or denying review in Golden Door Properties, LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
In Itochu Corporation v Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH [2012] EWCA Civ 996 the Court of Appeal refused to grant permission to appeal an order granted by Mr Justice Andrew Smith that a sole arbitrator be appointed in an arbitration between the applicants, Itochu Corporation (Itochu) and the respondents, Johann MK Blumenthal GMBH (Johann).Before Andrew Smith J, Johann had argued that, in the absence of an agreement between the parties, the default position set out in section… [read post]