Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 68,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
Heller v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
Co. of America v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 1:08 pm
Iowa 2014); East Sussex Children Servs. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
The court grants the motion to dismiss with prejudice. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 9:30 am
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012), the takings case argued earlier this week in the U.S. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:29 am
In the consolidated case Davis v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:40 am
Lebron v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Beard v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:17 am
The case of Ricky Lee Allshouse v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:10 pm
Kaye today filed a lawsuit to force the state Legislature and the governor into granting state judges their first pay raise since 1999. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 2:01 pm
The post Case Review – Sjostrom Sheet Metal Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
But on the 50-year anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:38 am
In Mathena v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 10:08 am
Pauley III granted the government’s motion to dismiss in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:03 am
On February 12, 2014, the United States District Court granted the United States’ motion for summary judgment which entitled the US to foreclose upon a taxpayer’s properties for back payroll and income taxes. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:40 pm
This was in fact stated by the tribunal Burlington v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:53 am
") AC30295 - State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:27 am
Integration Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
Mirzayance, No. 07-1315 The District Court's grant of Petitioner's habeas petition is reversed, where, whether the state court's denial of his ineffective assistance claim is reviewed under 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1)'s standard or de novo, Petitioner failed to establish that his counsel's performance was ineffective CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, SENTENCING Puckett v. [read post]
