Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2010, 2:32 pm
Judges are ideally made wiser from their range of life experiences; a broader range of experience among the justices seems likely only to enhance the Court’s collective wisdom. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:24 pm
Sister Helen Prejean tells us that we're all better than the worst thing we've ever done and none of us deserves to be judged on that basis. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 1:43 pm
Interestingly enough, they all hold the title of “Manager, Outside Plant Planning Engineering and Design. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:47 pm
Goldman Sachs never disclosed that the investment was designed to fail. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm
Judges are ideally made wiser from their range of life experiences; a broader range of experience among the justices seems likely only to enhance the Court’s collective wisdom. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:01 am
I’m not judging the problem you choose to solve. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:41 pm
” We’re betting a pretty penny that each of the initial nominees will do whatever it takes to stay in the pole position. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:01 am
The Ninth Circuit distinguished Quality King based on the fact that the labels were originally made in the US then shipped abroad before being re-imported. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:57 am
At 1 p.m., it was allowed to send 10 of the 109 designated for transfer. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:29 am
We’re still trying to hope that the judge will do the right thing. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:28 am
That's what happened in In re Viagra Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 06-1724, slip op. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
(not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARRERA for welding helmets: In re A.C.E. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:23 am
Nonetheless, In Re Lavelle shows at least one judge has become sensitive to the current economic situation and there is enough wiggle room in the law to provide a legal basis for making such a claim. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:01 am
Should we want Congress to take the lead in designing defenses? [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:59 am
"I don't think we're on a collision course," she said. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:45 am
Putting aside that it's marketing jargon designed to make it clear to lawyers that we have no future unless we incorporate the language of marketing into our lives and practices, the meaning is that we must define ourselves or we're nothing. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
Trying to design a cause of action that makes it unnecessary to allow defenses is probably impossible. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:46 pm
In fact, they're probably harmful. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:45 pm
The lawyers are seeking $204,000 each, in addition to $204,000 for the charity, whose U.S. assets are frozen because of its terror designation. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am
Barrett thinks we’re unlikely to see more defenses created by the courts. [read post]
