Search for: "In Re Member of Bar" Results 8221 - 8240 of 9,029
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2008, 9:48 pm
" A majority of Arizona's prisoners, they write, are non-violent offenders, with one-in-five behind bars for drug offenses. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 1:44 pm
No, you cannot bar owners and guests from walking through the lobby. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:06 pm
" The American responded that USSID 18 barred U.S. authorities from spying on the communication of Americans, so the British worker had nothing to worry about. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:47 am
Not, not the criminal bar association, but the other one, also known as the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
Herring The question in Herring was whether the exclusionary rule should be applied to bar evidence obtained through the search of a defendant whom the police believed had an outstanding warrant but who actually didn’t. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
In re Shinnecock Smoke Shop, Serial Nos. 78918061 and 78918500 (September 10, 2008) [not precedential].Section 2(a), in pertinent part, bars registration of a mark that "may ... falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, [or] institutions .... [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 pm
You're listening to Episode 131 on Tuesday, October 7th, 2008. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 6:09 pm
(Carver has asked the Guardian not to use his daughter's name, to protect the privacy of other family members.) [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Van Gorkom, a case decided a few months before Unocal in which Moore’s court found board members personally liable for not thoroughly considering a bid. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:54 pm
Let your supporters, members and friends know that you're attending this event. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 3:38 pm
Most lawyers are more than happy to share their experience with new members of the bar. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:23 pm
Passengers having too good a time at a ship bar also may be at risk, Lipcon writes. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 1:37 pm
The event is free for Section members, and others may attend for a nominal charge of $10. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
The federal judge held that individual issues in that case, such as whether the putative class members "had seen the advertisements," barred class certification. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 8:56 am
The only step court members are expected to take today is authorizing further studies by a team of representatives from county and district courts, the county attorney's office, each Commissioners Court member's office, the criminal defense bar, the Texas Fair Defense Project and the Texas Task Force on Indigent Defense. ...State Sen. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 7:27 am
Sturgell, supra, __ U.S. __ [128 S.Ct. 2161] would appear to preclude the use of collateral estoppel to bar absent putative class members from seeking class certification following the denial of a certification motion in an earlier lawsuit at least to the extent Taylor is understood as resting on due process considerations, and not simply federal common law. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 7:26 am
Sturgell, supra, __ U.S. __ [128 S.Ct. 2161] would appear to preclude the use of collateral estoppel to bar absent putative class members from seeking class certification following the denial of a certification motion in an earlier lawsuit at least to the extent Taylor is understood as resting on due process considerations, and not simply federal common law. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 6:35 pm
Passengers having too good a time at a ship bar also could be at risk, Lipcon writes. [read post]