Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 8221 - 8240
of 18,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
New Department of Justice Policy Means Corporate Officials Could be Targeted When the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
In Thorn v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:29 am
The high-water mark for socioeconomic disadvantage as an aspect of “diversity” in case law came in Bakke v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:16 am
As long as the Graham v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
Supreme Court which reversed, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Alito, in which Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Ginsburg, concurred in judgment only, and Justice Thomas wrote a solo separate concurrence in judgment only. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:50 am
“The Only Rational Outcome” As noted at the top of this post, a sense of the lawsuit’s futility comes through in the court’s decision as well as in the transcript of oral argument (read here) where, after observing that the 225 Broadway partnership agreement does not allow dissolution of the limited partnership or limited partner withdrawal, Justice Kornreich challenged plaintiff’s counsel, “basically I… [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 1:56 pm
To accede to this defence would be to re-write the contract between the parties and would be, in my view, an unacceptable interference in the business. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 6:59 am
,” as discussed in Mount Hope Church v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:30 am
In re: Hulu Privacy Litigation, — F. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
As we store away the wrapping paper and pull out the New Years’ hat and horns, we thought it would be a good time to review the significant agricultural law developments of 2015. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Petrotech Res. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:51 pm
In re BankAmerica Corp. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 6:44 pm
Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am
And the law was established in a decision, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Such was the story in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 12:54 pm
1984 was a bad year for the federal criminal justice system. [read post]
