Search for: "In re Page"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 38,211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm
”AALL also coordinated a letter signed by 15 other organizations advocating for the passage of H.R. 6714 the Electronic Court Records Reform Act, a bipartisan bill which was re-introduced in the US House of Representatives last Wednesday. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:34 am
Lewis was re-elected to office last year, but is vacating his seat to battle brain cancer. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:33 am
” In re: Davis, 557 U.S. 952 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:03 am
VI, p. 41 (2018), Belmont University College of Law Research Paper No. 2019-3 Number of pages: 37 Posted: 04 Feb 2019 Accepted Paper Series Bette Jacobs, Mehgan Gallagher and Nicole Heydt Georgetown University – School of Nursing & Health Studies, O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law and Prometheus Federal Services The United States First Climate Relocation: Recognition, Relocation, and Indigenous Rights at the Isle de Jean Charles… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
And they’re passionate. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
People rarely stop and think about the parties with whom they’re forming legally binding relationships online. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 11:24 am
I remember how some MEPs were really upset, especially when they realized that those unfavorable wiki pages were among the very first Google search results for their names. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:47 am
Bevin Deleting Comments to County Facebook Page May Violate First Amendment–Davison v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 10:47 pm
I would ask MEPs to reject the entire bill because it's the clearest message (then the Commission will have to go back to the drawing board and a new EP, with many EU skeptics, will give them an even harder time) or, if they're hesitant to do what actually made sense in 2005 for the software patents bill, they should delete Article 13. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:52 pm
Or randomly picked out volumes and cut out 50 pages with a scissors. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 1:39 pm
Submit résumé, 5-10 page writing sample, 3 letters of reference, and job application (available at www.nezperce.org) to Human Resources Director, P.O. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 12:39 pm
So, Prime Minister Abe came here -- I mean, it was the most beautiful... five-page letter. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
If you’re anything like me, you want to be one of those kinds of lawyers. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
If you’re anything like me, you want to be one of those kinds of lawyers. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:37 pm
(The official name of Lavabit case is In re Under Seal.) [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 6:10 am
Campaign Finance National: “Court Ruling Doesn’t Stop Untraceable Election Spending” by Brian Slodysko (Associated Press) for apnews.org Tennessee: “Tennessee Lawmakers Appeared to Violate Fundraising Rules – but They’re Unlikely to Face Penalties” by Joel Ebert for The Tennessean Elections National: “How Manafort’s 2016 Meeting with a Russian Employee at New York Cigar Club Goes to ‘the Heart’ of Mueller’s Probe”… [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
Westlaw tells me they're unaware of any other states in which recent precedents are similarly invisible, though if you are aware of some, please let me know. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 9:48 am
(See Figure 1, at page 33 of the paper, for a visual depiction of an equilibrium at which the % actually cooperating equals the % that are willing to cooperate at that level of cooperation.)I gather that philosophers have questioned this set-up, saying you aren't actually a Kantian if you're being conditional about it. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 9:00 am
You’d reach out and speak to our intake specialist who would talk through with you the things that you’re trying to accomplish, make sure that you’re a good fit for us. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 8:32 am
So, in attempting to apply the categorical imperative, there is a broader issue, which may have no simple or obvious answer, regarding the level of generality at which one should state the maxims that one is testing for rational consistency.To this day, I don't think that's bad for what was presumably a 2-page (or at the most 5-page) paper in an undergraduate Intro to Philosophy class. [read post]
