Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 29,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:15 pm
In October 2002, petitioner filed an ADR application to the Medical Board stating that she could not perform her duties due to respiratory problems caused by her work at the World Trade Center. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Ge v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 8:16 pm
C and B v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
The case, King v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm
And Fischer v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm
It was ruled in People v Kearns, People v Hernandez, People v Cash, People v Sumpter, People v Salaam, Matter of Vandover v Czaika and Matter of New York Satae Bd. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 4:50 pm
Co v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
Supreme Court ruling, in the landmark case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:30 pm
Interactive Digital Software Ass'n v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 1:45 pm
The decision in School Committee of Lowell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:46 pm
The court therefore blocked the issuance of an occupancy permit, partly on the theory that, in such cases of especially great public interest, a heightened level of notice was required. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
That aligns with the continued robustness of the core principles of globalization based on idea of a level playing field in which states have a duty to enhance value in the macro community, while economic enterprises have a micro obligation of value enhancement (mindful of business, legal, and financial risk) toward its community of investors or in some instances for the enhancement of its value as a going concern (discussed here). [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Rodriguez was an undocumented worker at the time of the injury, but cited a similar case, Artiga v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
., that even though the New Jersey Supreme Court had yet to determine whether an out-of-state remote worker who worked for a New Jersey-based company is protected by New Jersey’s employment laws, the New Jersey Appellate Division in Halliday v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am
It is clearly thought out and based on an assessment of reading the claimant refers to”; the tribunal accepted that the stated belief was about a “weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour”; and on balance, the belief had a level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion and importance, even though there were likely to be a great many people who disagreed with it [43]. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:58 am
Second, it is interesting on a visceral level, as we witness a taxpayer, to use a cliché, being hoisted on their own petard.United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 10:31 am
State v. [read post]
