Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 21,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2017, 5:47 am
The director was deemed 28 percent liable, the corporation that owns the land where the tracks were located was deemed 18 percent liable, the assistant director 7 percent liable and the producer 5 percent liable. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 5:57 pm
In a recent decision, the California Court of Appeal held that the trial court erred in granting defendant’s summary judgment motion regarding plaintiff’s claim for dangerous condition of public property. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 1:38 pm
The defendant failed field sobriety tests and recorded a .127 result on a blood-alcohol content test. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 7:01 am
Related Blog Posts Massachusetts Court Rules Security Supervisor’s Statement Inadmissible Hearsay in Slip and Fall Case at Mall Massachusetts Appeals Court Affirms Defense Verdict, Despite “Whopper” Told by Defendant’s Representative in Deposition [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 4:43 am
An affirmative defense is a defense in which the defendant argues that even if everything the plaintiff says is correct, defendant is still not liable because of the plaintiff’s own negligence. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:27 pm
But then the jury came back and found the defendant was not liable. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:27 pm
But then the jury came back and found the defendant was not liable. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:28 am
Although no one is attempting to hold the firm financially liable for content on the platform, Google argues that enforcing the Canadian order would impose a harm of the sort prohibited by the Communications Decency Act: “As the direct and proximate result of Defendants’ conduct, Google has suffered and, if Defendants’ conduct is not stopped, will continue to suffer, irreparable injury absent injunctive relief. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Under ordinary, longstanding common-law principles, a defendant who knowingly provides substantial assistance to the primary tortfeasor is liable. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 8:10 am
The court was tasked with determining whether the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to survive the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:14 am
The court began by noting that under the doctrine of respondeat superior, because Developer’s employees joined the boards under its direction and in furtherance of its objectives, Developer would be vicariously liable for any tortious acts committed by the board. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:11 am
Now that the question has returned to the court’s docket with Jesner v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 1:59 pm
How much is he still liable for? [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
While lis pendens may be obtained in Massachusetts ex parte, in order to obtain this relief, the court must make an additional finding that either (1) the defendant is not subject to the court’s jurisdiction or (2) there is a clear danger that the defendant, if notified in advance, will convey, encumber, damage, or destroy the property or its improvements. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
While lis pendens may be obtained in Massachusetts ex parte, in order to obtain this relief, the court must make an additional finding that either (1) the defendant is not subject to the court’s jurisdiction or (2) there is a clear danger that the defendant, if notified in advance, will convey, encumber, damage, or destroy the property or its improvements. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 10:30 am
While lis pendens may be obtained in Massachusetts ex parte, in order to obtain this relief, the court must make an additional finding that either (1) the defendant is not subject to the court’s jurisdiction or (2) there is a clear danger that the defendant, if notified in advance, will convey, encumber, damage, or destroy the property or its improvements. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:26 am
The plaintiff also claimed that the hospital was liable for medical malpractice, not only because of negligent medical treatment but also because its policy to review discrepancies between an ER doctor’s X-ray interpretation and a radiologist’s interpretation didn’t meet the relevant standard of care. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
A government entity can be liable in tort, however, if it takes an affirmative step to create a duty. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:48 am
” The court’s ATS precedent therefore makes clear that courts should not assume that corporations are proper defendants in ATS actions, but instead must determine as a matter of federal common law whether they should be. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
Given the foregoing, it is appropriate that both plaintiff and his attorneys be jointly and severally liable for the costs and fees, which the Court will assess after submission of billing records by defendant. [read post]
