Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 18,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2015, 2:08 pm
The standard established in the First and Second Departments required the events to be "relatively contemporaneous" if they are to support the finding of a family offense and the need for an immediate order of protection (Matter of Ashley P., 31 AD3d 767, 769 [2d Dept 2006]; Swersky v Swersky, 299 AD2d 540 [2d Dept 2002]; Yoba v Yoba, 183 AD2d 418 [1st Dept. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Courts don’t evaluate whether a defendant’s work is transforming the P’s identity, but rather how creative the d’s work is. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:56 pm
When confronted with a copy of the text message, Father admitted that he had sent the text "to let A.L. know that he was no longer in Applebee's where they were having a meal and had moved to the Barnes and Noble as he prefers using their toilet" (Plaintiff's #6 at p.6). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Finally, courts are construing purpose very narrowly to find D’s purpose different from P’s purpose. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 10:22 am
The post SUPREME COURT U-TURN appeared first on Karel's Legal Blog. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:26 am
As for the claimed off-label promotion, “[p]rescribing physicians had varied exposure to [defendant’s] marketing. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:10 pm
But there is another reason it matters. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:08 pm
” CSB Comment to OSHA, p. 19 (Mar. 31, 2014) and CSB Comments to EPA, p 24 (Oct. 29, 2014). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 8:55 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d 285 (Cal. 2008); City of Oakland v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
A more general negative reaction to the CJEU’s new public criterion follows from the fact that the issue of creating new or altered limitations and exceptions to copyright law or related rights within the EU, to have more precise solutions, to make them mandatory etc. are all matters to fall within the precise EU legislative framework, not as an effect of case law. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:22 pm
(See Matter of McGlone's Will, 284 N.Y. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Judge Michael P. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
P. 185. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d 285 (Cal. 2008); City of Oakland v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
’” SeeBandru at p. 6. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
(And let’s agree to not discuss other taboos). [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:05 pm
Firemark.Entertainment Law Offices of Gordon P. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Augustine, 156 P. 479, 480 (Cal. 1916)). [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Augustine, 156 P. 479, 480 (Cal. 1916)). [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:34 am
The standard established in the First and Second Departments required the events to be "relatively contemporaneous" if they are to support the finding of a family offense and the need for an immediate order of protection (Matter of Ashley P., 31 AD3d 767, 769 [2d Dept 2006]; Swersky v Swersky, 299 AD2d 540 [2d Dept 2002]; Yoba v Yoba, 183 AD2d 418 [1st Dept. [read post]
