Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 10,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2011, 9:40 am
Robert Lawson, Tim Marland p.99-108 # Sovereignty and the Chicago Convention: English Court of Appeal Rules on the Northern Cyprus Question Mark Franklin p.109-116 # Metal Neutrality and the Nation-Bound Airline Industry Paul V. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:17 pm
" The only possible justification is harming competitors, so the presumption in step 1 isn't triggered. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:30 pm
Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:47 pm
” Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
15 May 2011, 4:16 pm
Although the two lawbreaking networks have a multitude of differences – in terms of social harm, motivations, and structure – they also have important similarities. [read post]
14 May 2011, 10:25 am
The Lanham Act’s prohibition of the federal registration of scandalous and immoral marks provides an example of government promulgated content based restrictions that do not offend the Constitution. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm
Unlike our role in interpreting federal law, we may not “act as a judicial pioneer” in a diversity case.Id. at 253-54 (quoting Lead Industries; other citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:57 am
An injunction would subject Whirlpool to considerable costs in changing its ads and its product name as well as markings on the product itself and the associated literature, along with harm to its credibility and goodwill. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:49 am
The Lanham Act’s prohibition of the federal registration of scandalous and immoral marks provides an example of government promulgated content based restrictions that do not offend the Constitution. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:47 am
This commentary was provided by Mark Anderson, a Board Certified Personal Injury Trial Lawyer by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:14 am
For a free initial consultation regarding your securities claim, contact Mark Maddox at 800-505-5515. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
In April 2008 the PTO initially denied the application based on likely confusion with plaintiffs’ mark. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:53 pm
In supporting this position, Rusbridger referenced an article by lawyer Mark Thomson, published on this site: But let’s not muddle them with anonymised judgments or privacy injunctions, where we can report the cases, but not who’s involved. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:08 pm
Tucked inside the National Defense Authorization Act, being marked up by the House Armed Services Committee this week, is a hugely important provision that hasn't been getting a lot of attention — a brand new authorization for a worldwide war. [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:15 am
Although the two bills have import differences, both would mark a significant step in the regulation of the collection and use of personal information. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
Malicious wounding; inflicting grievous bodily harm. 4. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:22 pm
It is perhaps a mark of the respect people hold for The Telegraph that they are often surprised when its journalists misreport the law. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:37 pm
” Copyright © 2010 Mark Bennett. [read post]
9 May 2011, 8:00 am
Hat tip to Mark Ashton for his March 9, 2011 post [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:31 am
.' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) [read post]
