Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 8221 - 8240 of 9,856
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in the main opinion that the 2002 law was so broadly worded that it “covers the waterfront, including fish from the sea. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
“This motion [for contempt] is not about habeas relief, or whether the district court properly can order Parhat released into the United States. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:40 am by PJ Blount
Robert Lawson, Tim Marland p.99-108 # Sovereignty and the Chicago Convention: English Court of Appeal Rules on the Northern Cyprus Question Mark Franklin p.109-116 # Metal Neutrality and the Nation-Bound Airline Industry Paul V. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court was petitioned recently to take up Higginson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am by Calvin Massey
  As Robert Jackson said in Korematsu, this "principle," once imbedded, "lies about like a loaded weapon ready for the hand of any" President that wants to avoid the Senate's obligation and right to deliver its advice and consent (or not) to presidential appointments of principal officers of the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Lyle Denniston
  One side effect of the majority opinion was its negative view of an 1872 decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm by Adam Wagner
The UK Supreme Court Blog has posted on United States v Stevens, a US Supreme Court decision on animal cruelty videos, involving “freedom of expression in the extreme”. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
” Francisco argued that a “good cause” limit on the power to remove officers of the United States conflicts with the power the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 2:11 pm by Barbara Moreno
Walker, First Amendment and State Bans on Teachers’ Religious Garb:  Analyzing the Historic Origins of Contemporary Legal Challenges in the United States (2020). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm by zshapiro
The Supreme Court held in Holder v Humanitarian Law Project that one can be convicted of a crime for violating 18 U. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]