Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 8221 - 8240 of 14,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
But on September 12, 2011, his probation officer, John D'Alessandro, received an undated, anonymous letter stating that `[s]omeone really needs to check on Jimmy Lykins. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition, the employee’s retaliation claim alleging that the acting director told her peers “if you think you’re going to file some kind of EEO complaint and then be considered a team player, it’s much harder to be a team player on the outside than it is on the inside,” also survived summary judgment (Rose v Salazar, December 18, 2013, Daniel, W). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The Second Department used its December 18th decision in El-Dehdan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 11:03 am by Monique Altheim
(Forbes Cross-Post) http://ow.ly/2CgHsk  California’s New Do-Not-Track Law Goes Into Effect January 1, 2014, Remember To Check Your Privacy Policy For … ow.ly/2CimTG     Conferences   IAPP Daily Dashboard ‏@DailyDashboard17 Dec Coverage of last week’s #DPCongress #NSA panel w/ @ioerror @stewartbaker @bendrath & Vodafone (recording included) bit.ly/1kSpreu… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Here are the summaries from the Court’s website:Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee was also granted leave to amend her Title VII, Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, and defamation claims; however, her due process and intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) claims were dismissed with prejudice (McSparran v Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, December 17, 2013, Caldwell, W). [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:57 am by Ron Coleman
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:56 am
For more on the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law’s procedure, check out this site. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 7:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Managers who decided to fire a skycap after a passenger complained that he solicited tips likely knew of the CEO’s anger over the employee’s lead role in a separate FLSA suit and, given that skycaps were allowed to tell customers that tips were appreciated, a jury could find retaliatory animus was the but-for cause of the adverse action, determined the First Circuit, reversing summary judgment on the skycap’s retaliation claim (Travers v Flight… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]