Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 17,258
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
Bianco, M.D. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 am
” State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:09 am
California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:38 am
State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:38 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm
The court, in denying the motion, further erred in basing its decision on People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:37 pm
Lewis Rubin—one of the experts who survived the Daubertchallenge in the eleven year case—was sufficiently certain to count as evidence of medical causation under Pennsylvania state law. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:35 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am
United States), that the Justices were simply tired from the first argument, in Yates v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:11 am
State Farm filed a motion for summary judgment on all counts. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:53 am
From last week’s Long v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
So while Tyree places the count at 48, we believe that 51 United States Jurisdictions (counting DC and Puerto Rico) have adopted the learned intermediary rule, either by decision or statute. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
Last week, I wrote that Yates v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:59 am
See, e.g., Weisenberg v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
