Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 16,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Although the Republican governor of Texas ordered his own state guard to “monitor” the U.S. military while it is in his state (which is, of course, still one of the fifty united states that our armed forces protect), and even though the reliably unhinged Rep. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:02 pm
In Resch v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:03 am
The state already has a minimum wage, but it has become increasingly clear that state minimum wage does not equate to a living wage for the residents and workers in Los Angeles. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Joseph V. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
At the end of the 19th century, the United States government was much smaller than it is today. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Or as another court decision, Williamson v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:40 am
Only there was one small problem. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
" <> Turlock Irrigation District v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:22 am
The state supreme court upheld that reversal. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
By 2012, when the current litigation began, it was the largest pay TV operator there, offering around 200 channels in Mandarin and Cantonese, plus a small number of English language programmes — all being delivered by a set-top box. [read post]
16 May 2015, 7:30 am
Additional Resources: Police should avoid ineffective sobriety checkpoints, May 24, 2015, Montgomery Advertiser More Blog Entries: Morris v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 7:30 am
Additional Resources: Police should avoid ineffective sobriety checkpoints, May 24, 2015, Montgomery Advertiser More Blog Entries: Morris v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:45 pm
In a recent Supreme Court of California decision, Rashidi v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:21 pm
” Marina Bay Condos., Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:01 am
In Carcieri v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:33 am
Daniels v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
If a treatment is so new that its risks and benefits cannot accurately be assessed, then a warning about its experimental nature is appropriate, but that kind of warning is a small subset of “off-label use” as an FDA regulatory status.Here is the article’s thesis:This Article proposes a fiduciary framework to regulate physician innovation under conditions of endogenous [we think that means “inherent” in this context] uncertainty. [read post]
