Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 8221 - 8240 of 13,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2014, 5:07 am by Robin Shea
The proposed changes are intended to reflect (and expand upon) last year’s Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am by Amy Howe
California’s arguments Like the United States, California urged the court to subject the disclosure requirement to “exacting scrutiny” rather than “strict scrutiny. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
United States and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:22 am by Aaron Pelley
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/07/11/10-50240.pdf United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 17-1003. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBankingVisa's By-Law Prevented Banks From Switching To MasterCard, Violated Court's Final Judgment United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 1:20 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKGovernmentRelator's Sole Cognizable FCA Claim Rejected As 'Publicly Disclosed' Under §3730(e)(4)(A)United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:12 am by Kent Scheidegger
The international angle Up to this point, the drugs needed for lethal injection had been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
  No big surprise to us, since the United States Supreme Court held Mississippi ex rel. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Edward A. Fallone
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
  Certainly that is not true as a matter of California or Massachusetts or Canadian law, however. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:17 pm by Robert Chesney
Meanwhile, there’s an additional directive from the government: invoking his authority under the statutory framework for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), President Trump separately ordered TikTok’s parent company ByteDance to divest itself of TikTok within 90 days (with the possibility of a one-month extension). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:46 am by Nabiha Syed
” And finally, in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Far-right activists in the United States are planning a copycat convoy of truckers from California to Washington D.C. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Before O'Meara's resentencing, the Supreme Court of the United States decided in Blakely v. [read post]